A Matter of Timeline By Becca Campbell MSPs rarely lose control of a project all at once. More often than not, the problem already is there before the work begins, when early assumptions are still being treated as facts. These early assumptions can feel harmless because they usually look like momentum. The team accepts the timeline, moves past a dependency or leaves a client expectation loosely defined so the project can keep moving. During onboarding, an MSP may move forward without complete information from the previous provider about certain devices or licenses in the client environment. The same pattern can show up in a firewall replacement, migration or implementation when the team commits to a timeline before confirming the details that will affect delivery. At first, everything seems manageable. Then a license expires, a device goes down or another issue exposes what the team didn’t know. Now the support team is trying to solve an urgent problem that started as a missed step before the work was fully understood. For MSPs, that’s where project problems become expensive. They don’t just slow delivery. They put client trust at risk and create pressure for already busy teams. Significantly, they take time away from billable or higher-value work. Avoiding those issues starts before the work begins, when there’s still time to question the plan, pressure-test the assumptions and make sure the team is not carrying hidden risk into the project. Validate Before Anyone Commits MSPs want to be responsive, especially with a new or important client. Nobody wants to slow down a deal or make the work sound harder than it needs to be. And while everyone can mean well, that doesn’t help much once the team is stuck trying to deliver on a timeline that was never realistic. A simple task on paper still needs certain resources to complete it. A team might want to tell the client, “We can get this done in a day,” but if the work depends on one engineer who is already booked, that one-day promise could actually require a week. The issue is not that the MSP is moving too slowly. It’s that the timeline was accepted before the team confirmed who could actually do the work. Before committing to a timeline, MSPs should validate: • which roles or resources are required – both internally and with the customer; • whether those resources are actually available; • which tasks depend on specialized knowledge; • what assumptions are being made about timing; and • what happens if an early step takes longer than expected. MSPs are solving project issues too late; fix this before work begins 34 CHANNELVISION | SUMMER 2026
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTg4Njc=